(Note – this article is more of a
deep analysis than a typical review, and thus contains some minor thematic
spoilers)
George A. Romero will forever be immortalized
in film history and beloved by fans for the groundbreaking way that he combined
sharp social commentary with boundary-pushing extreme horror in his Night/Dawn/Day of the Dead trilogy, and
for how he revitalized the horror-anthology storytelling format with Creepshow and Tales from the Darkside. But
when asked in interviews to name his personal favorite from his body of work,
his answer was not any of the above classics, but his comparatively more
obscure 1978 horror/drama/thriller, Martin.
A most unusual take on the concept of vampirism which can also be read as a
non-supernatural tale of mental illness inherited through psychological abuse, Martin is arguably the film where Romero
really came into his own as a filmmaker. Made after the conceptually
interesting but undeniably flawed The
Crazies, this was his most confident, self-assured, stylistically and
thematically rich film yet, and it began his career-long collaborations with
cinematographer Michael Gornick and special effects maestro Tom Savini (who
also acts in the film). In that sense it was the artistic stepping-stone that
prepared him and that same core group of collaborators to make his magnum opus Dawn of the Dead (released the same
year), but it deserves to be better appreciated as a small masterpiece of indie
horror in its own right.
Martin (John Amplas) is a deeply
troubled young man. Most of the time he comes off as a normal, if awkward,
quiet and sensitive introvert, but inwardly he is losing a battle against a
dark compulsion that drives him to go out and commit brutal murders – and drink
his victims’ blood in a sort of psychosexual ritual which may or may not be
vampirism. His devoutly religious – to the point of being fanatical and
cult-like – Romanian family believes he is a vampire, and they have raised him
to believe the same thing about himself; but he has no supernatural powers,
just a bloodlust that he hates but cannot control. Romero’s film walks a
narrative tightrope between two possibilities: he could indeed be a vampire, as
his strange Uncle Cuda (Lincoln Maazel) insists, or he could simply be a
mentally-ill young man whose family has effectively gas-lit and psychologically
battered him into believing that he is a soulless monster to the point that he is
actually becoming one. The film presents evidence for both theories, and
sequences which could either be flashbacks or fantasies depending on which
theory you believe, and asks the viewers to draw their own conclusions. The way
in which Romero has crafted a story that can be read in two very different ways
is fascinating and quite ambitious, and makes for a very compelling puzzle of a
character study. Either way, Martin is a
character of deep inner conflict: a boy who clearly just wants to be normal,
and gets no joy out of harming others, but feels compelled to by forces that he
isn’t equipped to resist. Whether he is bound by the blood curse that Cuda
believes in, or whether his upbringing of psychological abuse and religious
fanaticism has pushed him over the edge into psychosis rather than pulling him
back from it, his story is very much a tragic one. Romero generally refused to
give a firm yes or no answer to questions of whether Martin is actually a
vampire, but in a German TV documentary about his body of work, shot between Martin and Dawn of the Dead and included on the Arrow Video DVD of Martin, he says that that’s not the
point; the story is about how either way, the monster that Martin is becoming
is shaped by belief and how it impacts behavior, and that “we create our own
monsters.”
Romero makes a bold storytelling
choice in how he begins the film: we first meet Martin in a genuinely
horrifying and hard-to-watch scene in which he kills and feeds on a young
woman; a murder made all the more disturbing because of how sexual it is. It is
a brutal, punch-in-the-gut of an opening sequence which causes us to begin the
film seeing Martin as a monster who does irredeemably horrible things. But then
gradually Romero peels back the layers of how he got that way; the factors that
shaped someone who could have, under different circumstances, been a normal
young man into a serial killer (or a vampire, or both). Against all odds,
Romero makes Martin a sympathetic character, or at least an understandable one,
with his central story arc being an internal struggle for his own humanity. The
story deconstructs the idea that those who commit horrible deeds must at a
basic level be monsters, and asks if they really had to be that way, if at some
point they had the capacity to go down a different path, and what factors in
their lives might have pushed them one way or another. In all of these ways, Martin very much has a companion film in
2017’s My Friend Dahmer, an even more
disturbing (in large part because it is true) character study which similarly
captures a troubled-but-sympathetic young man in a psychologically-destructive
social environment just crossing the precipice into a darkness from which there
is no coming back. It is hard to tell if My
Friend Dahmer (or its source graphic novel) was actually influenced by Martin, but it is entirely possible; at
the very least, the two films would make one potent double-feature.
In keeping with the narrative
conceit of stripping down the vampire mythos to a disturbing realist
reinterpretation, Romero and cinematographer Michael Gornick shoot Martin with grim, gritty authenticity,
capturing the blue-collar decay of their native Pittsburgh with striking,
almost documentary-like handheld camerawork. It is an impressive-looking film;
clearly a low-budget indie, but one that uses its natural settings with great
effectiveness. Romero’s approach is not all grim, however: the film has a
definite streak of dark humor, at the core of which is the exasperated conflict
between Martin, who tries to rebel against his upbringing of vampire mythology
even as he is consumed by it, and his fanatical, scenery-chewing, more than a
little bit ridiculous Uncle Cuda. While it is not always clear how much Cuda is
supposed to be a comic character and how much Lincoln Maazel’s manic delivery
and Colonel-Sanders-ish appearance makes him that way, his characterization of
a camp Van Helsing filtered through the stereotype of a grumpy old man is thoroughly
entertaining. The comic relief is much more clearly obvious in George Romero’s
own small role as a wine-loving hippie-ish priest who just can’t bring himself
to take Cuda’s concerns about vampires the least bit seriously. Just as campy
(though again, perhaps not intentionally so) is the audio motif across the
film’s black-and-white flashbacks, in which a young woman’s voice repeatedly
calls out Martin’s name, frequently enough that viewers will almost certainly
feel the temptation to join in. This mix of camp with the film’s genuinely dark
horror makes it quite a bit of fun, rather than just being disturbing, and
undoubtedly increases its rewatch value. It also is likely what inspired new
wave duo Soft Cell (who likewise enjoyed mixing camp and darkness) to write a
song of the same name, retelling the events of the film over synth-heavy riffs
on its soundtrack and samples of that woman’s voice repeatedly calling
“Maaaartin” – a profoundly unlikely confluence of cult film and cult music
which provides a very amusing footnote to this underappreciated entry in
Romero’s filmography.

Night of the Living Dead, Dawn
of the Dead, and Day of the Dead are
iconic not just because they handle the zombie concept exceptionally well, but
because they are ultimately stories about the darker aspects of human nature,
and about facing and combating them. The same is true of Martin and then some: it may ostensibly be a vampire movie, or it
may not be (depending on your perspective), but whether it is or not its
“monster” is ultimately very human, and the things that make him monstrous have
a lot less to do with the lore that Cuda believes in, and a lot more to do with
the psychological ramifications of those beliefs, in how the family treats
Martin and in how Martin has internalized them himself. Vampire stories often
take the form of an exploration of the vampire’s tortured soul, but Martin has got to be one of the most
unique interpretations of that formula, as an interview with a vampire becomes
indistinguishable from a portrait of a young man struggling against his own
internal darkness. It may not have the epic scale of Dawn of the Dead or the comic-book ghoulishness of Creepshow, but it is very evident why
the potent and unique Martin was
George Romero’s personal favorite among his films, and it deserves to be
remembered as an important part of his legacy.
Don't be a monster, share this review!