Arrow Video: Audrey Rose (1977) - Reviewed

Courtesy of MGM
World renowned filmmaking jack-of-all-tradesman producer-director-editor Robert Wise was more than a legend in his own time.  Having edited Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane before going on to winning the Best Director and Best Picture Academy Awards for West Side Story and The Sound of Music, this indefatigable film-worker giant seemed adept at any genre he crossed paths with and was no stranger to drama, science-fiction and/or horror.  Having directed Boris Karloff in 1945 with The Body Snatcher before cementing his reputation as a master of the genre with his 1963 psychological thriller The Haunting, it was only a matter of time before he’d revisit horror once more.   
 
In 1977 with an adaptation of The Entity author Frank De Felitta’s novel Audrey Rose, Wise’s film capitalized on such recently successful genre fare as The Omen, Don’t Look Now, The Exorcist or Rosemary’s Baby while siphoning out the nastier venoms of those works.  The result is one of the late 1970s more serious minded and less flashy entries in the supernatural child thriller subgenre, a film that takes the subject seriously without leaning into exploitation while channeling powerful performances from all the actors.  It also establishes Frank De Felitta who adapted and co-produced the film as perhaps the most narrative voice in horror fiction since William Peter Blatty.

 
Bill (John Beck) and Janice Templeton (Marsha Mason) live a quiet, happy life with their 11-year-old daughter Ivy (Susan Swift) when they begin noticing a strange, bearded man in a raincoat seems to be following them.  After police calls fail to deal with the stalking, the eventually reaches out to them formally introducing himself as Elliot Hoover (Anthony Hopkins).  
Agreeing to sit and talk over dinner with the man, Hoover explains he is a widower who lost his wife and young daughter Audrey Rose in a car accident.  Moreover, he further claims their daughter Ivy is in fact the reincarnation of Audrey Rose and that she was born only minutes after Audrey’s passing.  Not long thereafter, Ivy begins experiencing paralyzing night terrors seeming to stem from Audrey’s final moments and breaks into hysterical fits that can only be calmed by Hoover’s intervention as “Audrey’s father”.
 
Less of a film about demonic possession than examining the notion of what happens to the soul when it leaves a person’s body, stoking existential horror fears of your child perhaps not really being your own, Audrey Rose is a handsomely rendered answer to the heavier more extreme genre fare that preceded it.  While a lower budgeted piece for the usually grandiose filmmaker (Wise followed this with Star Trek: The Motion Picture), it nevertheless represents a healthy antidote to the films that informed it and a quieter, more cerebral return to the genre he mastered two times before.  

Much of the strength comes from how De Felitta’s story takes place in the present modern day setting and asks viewers to submit to an absurd idea in a plausible realistic arena.  Though Felitta himself would invariably go down the more extreme horror path with The Entity, his ability to pit skepticism against superstition in both stories along with his obsession with the afterlife makes him a bit of a proto-Bruce Joel Rubin screenwriter equally transfixed by death.

 
Shot beautifully by frequent comedy (and sometimes thriller) cinematographer Victor J. Kemper, the eye behind such fare as Eyes of Laura Mars to Pee Wee’s Big Adventure, the look of Audrey Rose is very classy.  One particularly striking image which was used in some poster and VHS cover releases involves a recurring vista of Ivy in one of her fits inexplicably burning her hands on a cold wet window, screaming and crying out as the camera sits outside the window watching the raindrops trickle down.  It’s a terrifying, claustrophobic image that manages to instill many of the same fears as Owen Roizman’s dynamic cinematography on The Exorcist. 
 
Then there’s the score by renowned and accomplished composer Michael Small, the same man who scored Klute, The Parallax View and Marathon Man, which instills fear and unease in the viewer as we experience with these parents the terror of a stranger coming in to claim your child as his own as your child seems to go mad.  Primarily orchestral, the score echoes what would or would not become the style of Howard Shore in David Cronenberg’s work, spilling out all kinds of notes of calm before building up to a storm of sound. 
 
Let it be said all four of the main players in this psychological thriller touching on notions of reincarnation and possession give top tier performances in a genre that still doesn’t get enough respect from the Academy.  Marsha Mason makes the mother of this well-to-do family increasingly frightened by the mysterious man encroaching upon her world followed by the strange changes happening within her daughter while also wrestling with her skeptical husband played equally brilliantly by John Beck whose own anger towards the situation beyond his control breaks into rages.  Anthony Hopkins, many the film’s finest actor, does a fantastic job of making the strange Elliot Hoover seem eccentric if not a little crazy while still channeling powerful emotions of his own onscreen.  Last but not least is newcomer Susan Swift who never acted before but bites and claws with all her might at this role, rivaling the great Linda Blair even.

 
Despite all of the above, Audrey Rose kind of came and went at the box office, amassing a meager $2 million beneath its production budget.  Critics who generally respected Wise’s oeuvre came down on the movie citing it as yet another The Exorcist rip-off while complaining how the picture seems to shift gears into a quasi-courtroom drama for a brief time including but not limited to hypnosis at one point.  

Still in the years since the film has enjoyed renewed cult interest as the great director’s final horror film in his otherwise illustrious career.  After recent critical reappraisal of Felitta’s The Entity followed by Wise’s director’s cut of Star Trek: The Motion Picture finally getting a due proper release, its time modern viewers came back and reassessed this passionately acted psychological horror gem that dares to ask existential questions about the possibilities of life before or after this one.

--Andrew Kotwicki