Criterion Corner: Performance (1970) - Reviewed

Images courtesy of Janus Films

Scottish painter Donald Cammell’s 1970 co-directorial effort with then-cinematographer Nicolas Roeg Performance is one of the greatest unsung psychotronic surreal horror freakouts of British cinema featuring one of rock and roll’s signature lords of darkness with Mick Jagger in perhaps his most striking screen time to date.  A film on paper that should’ve been a music-movie vehicle for The Rolling Stones frontman that in practice turned out to be a poisonous provocation about the gulf between the British gangster and the British rock star, Performance quickly joined the likes of Michelangelo Antonioni’s equally divisive and hallucinatory provocation Zabriskie Point which also sported Pink Floyd music.  What to do with this unreleasable underground kaleidoscopic elliptical abstraction(?), wondered Warner Brothers who kept it on the shelf for two years before dumping it in 1970 following the success of X rated films like Midnight Cowboy. 
 
Mired in controversy and rumors about whether or not the sex and drug use onscreen was real (some of it turned out to be) or if the gangsters in it were real and not professional actors or the perhaps actual maddening toll it took on its lead actor James Fox who wouldn’t act again for another ten years, initially Performance was reviled upon release.  A forgotten footnote in Roeg’s career while Donald Cammell only made three more features including the 1977 sci-fi horror film Demon Seed and the 1987 horror film White of the Eye before tragically dying of suicide in 1996.  Roeg would overshadow Cammell substantially for decades including such renowned modern classics as Don’t Look Now, Walkabout, The Man Who Fell to Earth, Bad Timing, Insignificance and especially The Witches, something Cammell would later resent Roeg for as the film’s bold and pioneering elliptical editing style would become trademark across the rest of Roeg’s oeuvre. 
 
The story, if there is a narrative in this hedonistic odyssey through headspaces, seems to involve an East London gangster named Chas (James Fox) whose job is to rough up debtors though for the most part its all an act.  However, following a dispute with his boss over a betting shop resulting in the violent death of another gangster, he dyes his hair red, dons sunglasses and a trenchcoat and ventures out to the countryside to go hide for awhile.  Landing in the Notting Hill Gate home of Turner (Mick Jagger), a hedonistic Bohemian ex-musician living with Pherber (Anita Pallenberg) and Lucy (Michele Breton) in a kind of drug and sex fueled hippie commune.  Very quickly, the film becomes a late-sixties countercultural reinterpretation of Ingmar Bergman’s Persona with the two vastly different lifestyles bleeding into one another.  Aware of their new guest’s existential crisis, a dose of psychedelic mushrooms and Pherber and Turner engage with Chas into an androgynous, increasingly inebriated wallow into the inferno with Chas as Dante and Turner as this Hellscape’s Virgil. 
 
The violent, angry birth of a boldly new style of storytelling and filmmaking, the emergence of Donald Cammell and particularly Nicolas Roeg on the silver screen, Performance is maybe the most singularly anarchic British film of the early 1970s next to A Clockwork Orange, Straw Dogs and The Devils.  The most aggressively abstractly weird British film of the decade next to Jerzy Skolimowski’s The Shout, another sensorial interpretive psychotronic freakout, the film features amid the intentionally incoherent whirlwind editing of the first hour a gifted if not David Hemmings-esque performance (no pun intended) from lead actor James Fox.  In the film’s early developmental stages when it was more of a carefree comedy before evolving into a production Warner Brothers wanted to wash their hands of, Marlon Brando was in consideration for the Fox role.  Channeling Alain Delon’s Le Samourai in some respects before gradually morphing into Syd Barrett, its a committed out-on-a-limb piece of acting.

 
The beacon of this strange waking nightmare is Mick Jagger who technically made his screen debut with the western Ned Kelly but in actuality shot this two-years earlier.  From his androgynous effeminate sexuality, constantly surrounded by nubile women falling out of their clothes, his eyelashes that seem to sparkle on camera, his sermonizing to the film’s hero, Jagger much like David Bowie who would star in Roeg’s The Man Who Fell to Earth is an impenetrable force of nature.  With magnetic, infectious screen presence which Roeg knows precisely how to capture and integrate the spirit of on 35mm film, Jagger despite having appeared on film many times later over the years gives whether he meant to or not something of a transcendent performance.  One scene which particularly catches one’s attention is a surreal dream sequence in which Chas the gangster imagines going back to confront his fellow adversaries only this time rehabilitated into Turner form.  As Turner cavorts about and scowls the lyrics to Memo from Turner and emasculates gangsters asking them to disrobe, we find ourselves in the uncharted sociopolitical satirical territory of Lindsay Anderson’s if… as well as its sister sequel O Lucky Man! 

 
Also spectacular in this netherworld of hedonistic sensorial excess is Anita Pallenberg whose sex scenes with Mick Jagger (rumored to be unsimulated) created a rift with his The Rolling Stones bandmate Keith Richards at the time and they had to get Ry Cooder to step in to play the guitar on the film version of Memo from Turner.  Despite the scenes of actual heroin use in one shot of Pallenberg openly shooting into her exposed buttocks, Pallenberg much like Jagger who was a part of their entourage before the film came along sort of joins Jagger’s Turner as the knowing seductive queen of this circle of Hell.  Drifting in and out of this void is Lucy (Michele Breton) who also like Pallenberg is something of an impish succubus in Turner and Pherber’s sphere when little girl Lorraine (Laraine Wickens) isn’t popping about sporting a fake mustache, further adding to the madcap hallucinatory nature of the piece.  Also for those who are really looking, Ken Colley aka Admiral Piett from The Empire Strikes Back and The Devils shows up in it as a close friend of the film’s hero Chas. 

 
Much like The Devils, another X rated British shocker from Warner Brothers, the studio after financing and looking at the film tried to wash their hands of it before dumping Performance into theaters with an incoherent marketing campaign.  Budgeted at $1.5 million, it was a take it or leave it proposition for the studio and churning out another X rated film might draw in some countercultural attention.  Despite the almost universally negative initial reception it received, the film began garnering cult revival screenings until the 1990s had reversed its reputation completely into reappraisal.  By the 2000s, it gained an ardent following with particular attention devoted to Mick Jagger’s acting with the periodical Film Comment naming it the greatest acting performance by a musician in cinema history.  Later still Quentin Tarantino called it one of the greatest rock movies of all time and James Fox’s gangster his favorite British gangster portrait. 

 
Since being canonized into The Criterion Collection in a new 4K UHD special edition, the reputation of Performance as a still distinctly bold masterwork eons ahead of its time continues to grow.  With renewed attention through MTV and Big Audio Dynamite’s song E=MC2 which featured audio samples from the film, Coil’s Further Back and Faster and Happy Mondays’ Bummed featuring several songs echoing the plotline of the film, it was coming up through musical circles which only fueled cult interest.  Tony Scott was also an avowed fan and made references to it in Beat the Devil and later True Romance.  Looking at it now, it is every bit as unbending to interpretation and inaccessible to the senses as it was when Warner executives first saw test screenings of it.  A movie that seemed, much like Antonioni’s Blow Up, to capture the essence of the mod-sixties leading towards the darker themed violence of the seventies, Performance still won’t be for most people but others it will be a roller coaster ride that’s hard to know when to loosen your grip from.

--Andrew Kotwicki